Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

LAKE SUPERIOR CONSOLIDATED IRON MINES ET. AL v. LORD ET AL. BURROWS ET AL. V. LORD ET AL. ROYAL MINERAL ASSOCIATION ET AL. V. LORD ET AL. BOEING ET AL. V. LORD ET AL. WHITESIDE ET AL. V. LORD ET AL. MERRIMAC MINING COMPANY V. LORD ET AL. BARDWELL ET AL. V. SARGENT LAND CO. ET AL.

decided: June 7, 1926.

LAKE SUPERIOR CONSOLIDATED IRON MINES ET. AL
v.
LORD ET AL.

BURROWS ET AL
v.
LORD ET AL.

ROYAL MINERAL ASSOCIATION ET AL
v.
LORD ET AL.

BOEING ET AL
v.
LORD ET AL.

WHITESIDE ET AL
v.
LORD ET AL.

MERRIMAC MINING COMPANY
v.
LORD ET AL.

BARDWELL ET AL
v.
SARGENT LAND CO. ET AL.



APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.

Taft, Holmes, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler, Sanford, Stone

Author: Mcreynolds

[ 271 U.S. Page 578]

 MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

By their several bills in the United States District Court, appellants alleged the invalidity of Chapter 226, Laws of Minnesota, approved April 11, 1923, because of conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment and the State Constitution. They sought to prevent its enforcement. That court held the enactment valid and, by decrees entered

[ 271 U.S. Page 579]

     January 15, 1925, dismissed the bills. These appeals followed.

The challenged Act (fourteen sections), effective from its passage, provides --

"Sec. 1. There shall be levied and collected upon all royalty received during the year ending December 31, 1923, and upon all royalty received during each calendar year thereafter, for permission to explore, mine, take out and remove ore from land in this State, a tax of six (6) per cent.

"Sec. 2. For all purposes of this Act the word 'royalty' shall be construed to mean the amount in money or value of property received by any person having any right, title or interest in or to any tract of land in this state for permission to explore, mine, take out and remove ore therefrom; and the word 'person' shall be construed to include individuals, co-partnerships, associations, companies and corporations."

Succeeding sections relate to reports to the Tax Commission, method of assessment, penalties, date of payment, etc. Section 5 provides: "A person subletting land for the use of which he received royalty shall be required to pay taxes only on the difference between the amount of royalty paid by him and the amount received." And Section 8: "The situs of royalty for all purposes of this act shall be in this state; and the tax herein provided for shall be a specific lien from the time the same is due and payable upon all and singular the right, title and interest of the person to whom such royalty is payable, in and to the land for permission to explore, mine, take out and remove ore on which the royalty is paid."

Article IX, Section 1, Constitution of Minnesota: "The power of taxation shall never be surrendered, suspended or contracted away. Taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects, and shall be levied and collected for public purposes . . ."

[ 271 U.S. Page 580]

     Extensive areas in northeastern Minnesota contain beds of rich iron ore and derive their chief value therefrom. Titles to these lands are held by many resident and nonresident individuals and corporations. For many years these owners have followed the common practice of making long-term leases (ordinarily fifty years) to parties who agree to mine the ore and pay the lessor, or his successors, at some designated place, a specified amount ($.125 to $1.25), or royalty, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.