Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tommy v. Lighterage

CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT


February 17, 1930

THE TOMMY; LEE & SIMMONS, INC.,
v.
CUMMINGS LIGHTERAGE & TRANSP. CO. ET AL.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

The lighter Tommy was under charter to the Cummings Lighterage & Transportation Company, and was at Pier 2, Erie Basin, for the purpose of taking on a cargo of iron and steel. On the morning of September 15, 1926, the lighter was lying alongside the steamship Souvier. This steamer was lying bow out of the slip with her starboard side to Pier 2, and the Tommy was lying starboard side to the steamer with her bow also pointing out of the slip. She was loaded with iron rails from hatch No. 4, and about noon she was dropped back by the stevedores and her captain, to permit another lighter to load from hatch No. 4. Lines were run from the bow of the Tommy to the steamer and from her stern to a lighter lying astern of the steamer. There was no other place in the slip to which she could have been shifted. This was a safe berth. When moved back to overlap the ship's stern, she was clear of the ship's propeller. The bow was against the ship's port side and was either overlapped or flush with the barge lying against the pier. The other lighter was fifty or sixty feet astern of the steamer.

In some way, unexplained in this record, the Tommy got diagonally behind the steamer and is claimed to have struck the propeller. Liability was imposed below upon the Chiarello Stevedoring Company, Inc., for moving her into a place which brought her in contact with the propeller. But there is no evidence to support this charge. How she came to move out does not appear, and her stern could not have gotten to the pier unless a line running to the lighter was slackened or parted. Merely moving her back from No. 4 hatch, unless she was put in a position of danger, would not render the Chiarello Stevedoring Company, Inc., liable for that which happened thereafter, and the decree as to the Chiarello Stevedoring Company, Inc., must be reversed.

The contract of hire imposed liability on the Cummings Lighterage & Transportation Company for failure to return the barge in as good condition as received, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and it was held for breach thereof below. It has not appealed. Reversing the decree against the Chiarello Stevedoring Company, Inc., imposes primary liability upon it.

The decree will be reversed as to the defendant the Chiarello Stevedoring Company, Inc., and the Cummings Lighterage & Transportation Company now becomes primarily liable for the damages.

Decree modified.

19300217

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.