Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SALVATORI v. MILLER MUSIC

December 9, 1940

SALVATORI
v.
MILLER MUSIC, Inc., et al.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: CAMPBELL

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion made on behalf of the defendant Miller Music, Inc.

1. To dismiss the action as to the defendant, Miller Music, Inc., on the ground that it is in the wrong district because this is an action under the Copyright Law of the United States, and neither said defendant nor any agent of said defendant is an inhabitant of, or may be found in, the Eastern District of New York;

 2. To dismiss the action as against defendant Miller Music, Inc., on the ground that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the person of said defendant;

 3. To dismiss the action as against defendant Miller Music, Inc., or in lieu thereof to quash the return of service of summons directed to it on the ground that said defendant was not and is not subject to service of process in this action.

 It clearly appears from the complaint that this is an action arising solely under the Copyright Laws of the United States.

 The complaint alleges that the defendant, Miller Music, Inc., published a song entitled "Make Believe Island" and that said song was an infringement of plaintiff's song, entitled "This is Heaven". A. I. Namm & Sons is alleged in the complaint to be an inhabitant of the Eastern District of New York, and is joined as a defendant as the alleged seller of the song at retail.

 The allegation as to diversity of citizenship is superfluous, as the action is brought under the Copyright Law, and not under Section 52 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. ┬ž 113.

 The defendant, Miller Music, Inc., is not, and never was, an inhabitant of, and is not and never was, to be found in the Eastern District of New York, nor has it, or did it ever have an agent, inhabitant of, or to be found in said district.

 The defendant, Miller Music, Inc., does not, and never did maintain an office or place of business, or transact any business directly, or by an agent, in the Eastern District of New York.

 While the complaint alleges that the defendant, Miller Music, Inc., sold copies of its musical composition to defendant A. I. Namm & Sons, it does not allege that such sale took place in the Eastern District of New York.

 The summons and complaint herein were served upon the defendant, Miller Music, Inc., at its executive offices in the Southern District of New York.

 As this action arises solely under the Copyright Law, the venue is controlled by that law, 17 U.S.C.A., and not determined by the provisions of the Judiciary Act, which apply to other suits in the District Courts. Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc., 261 U.S. 174, 176, 43 S. Ct. 312, 67 L. Ed. 596.

 Section 35 of the Copyright Law reads as follows: "That civil actions, suits, or proceedings arising under this title may be instituted in the district of which the defendant or his agent ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.