Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

NERI v. UNITED STATES

November 2, 1951

NERI
v.
UNITED STATES



The opinion of the court was delivered by: GODDARD

This is a suit brought under the Public Vessels Act, Title 46 U.S.C.A. § 781, in which the libelant seeks an award for salvage services allegedly rendered to respondent.

The libelant Tito Neri is an Italian national and resident who does business in Italy under the name of Impresa Di Salvataggi Fratelli Neri (Neri Brothers Salvage Enterprise). At the time the salvage services were allegedly rendered, libelant was the owner of three tugboats; the Luigi, the Nettuno, and the Meloria.

The respondent was the owner of the Signal Hills, a T-2 tanker. On February 15, 1945, this vessel, title to which was held by the War Shipping Administration, was delivered to Pacific Tankers, Inc., as general agent of the United States under the usual form of GAA agreement. During the period with which we are concerned, the Signal Hills was allocated to the United States Navy.

 On October 8, 1946, the Signal Hills, after discharging a cargo of oil for the Navy at Vado Lagure, Italy, was proceeding in ballast to Bahrein in the Persian Gulf to take on another cargo of oil for the Navy. At approximately 0600, there was an explosion, apparently caused by the vessel's striking a mine. The ship's log showed her position at that time to be a few miles within a mined area and about 25 miles from Livorno (Leghorn), Italy.

 After examining the damage, the master decided that there was no danger of the vessel's sinking but radioed to the United States Naval Authorities in Rome for assistance. The Naval authorities notified the local authorities at the port of Livorno of the Signal Hill's need of assistance. The port commander, an Italian Naval Officer, ordered the libelant to send tugs to aid her. The libelant then dispatched his tugs to the Signal Hills.

 The Signal Hills proceeded under her own power at half speed for about forty-five minutes. Then, the master, believing that the vibrations caused by the use of her engines endangered the vessel, ordered the engines stopped. At all times thereafter until taken in tow, the Signal Hills drifted. There was evidence which tended to indicate that she drifted toward the minefield.

 At approximately 1240 the Signal Hills was taken in tow by an Italian mine sweeper, the D-211, and very shortly thereafter by the libelant's tug, the Luigi G. There was a sharp conflict in the testimony as to whether the Signal Hills was still in the minefield at the time she was taken in tow by the Luigi G. In the view I take of this case, it is unnecessary to decide this question.

 After a short time, the D-211 cut her tow line. A United States Army tug, ST-333, took a tow line but at 1500 she too cut her line because of engine difficulties.

 Libelant's second tug, the Nettuno, took a tow line at 1330 and a third tug, the Meloria, also belonging to libelant, took another line at 1645. Thereafter and until the Signal Hills was safely docked in Livorno at approximately 2100, the libelant's three tugs towed and assisted her.

 The respondent contends that (1) a state of war existed between Italy and the United States on October 8, 1946, and, under the terms of the Treaty of Peace signed on February 10, 1947, and ratified on June 14, 1947, and which became effective on September 15, 1947, 61 Stat. 1245, the Italian Government, on behalf of itself and its nationals, waived any claim libelant may have had against the United States, 61 Stat. 1245, 1401; (2) By agreement entered into on August 14, 1947, between the United States and Italy, the United States was discharged from liability for salvage claims where the alleged services were rendered to public vessels of the United States; and (3) Even if libelant's claim were not waived by the Treaty of Peace and/or the Memorandum of Understanding, the libelant is not entitled to any award because the alleged salvage services were not voluntarily rendered.

 I think that the respondent's contention that libelant's claim is barred by the Treaty of Peace and the 1947 Memorandum of Understanding must be sustained.

 Part VI of the Treaty of Peache with Italy, 61 Stat. 1245, 1397, relates to claims arising out of the war. Section III thereof concerns renunciation of claims by Italy. Article 76 of this section, 61 Stat. 1245, 1401, provides as follows:

 '1. Italy waives all claims of any description against the Allied and Associated Powers on behalf of the Italian Government or Italian nationals arising directly out of the war or out of actions taken because of the existence of a state of war in Europe after September 1, 1939, whether or not the Allied or Associated Power was at war with Italy at the time, including the following:

 '(a) Claims for losses or damages sustained as a consequence of acts of forces or authorities of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.