The opinion of the court was delivered by: WEINFELD
As indicated at the hearing attended by counsel, the following disposition is made of the motion to quash with respect to the revised subpoena duces tecum:
Item 1 -- Delete 'Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens or Westchester' and change date from 'September 1, 1944' to 'September 1, 1945';
Item 5 -- Delete 'New York City and Westchester' in (a) and (b) and insert 'Manhattan' and change date from 'September 1, 1944' to 'September 1, 1945';
Items 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9 -- Withdrawn;
The motion to strike various allegations contained in the amended complaint with respect to the Paramount decree is granted except those alleging the entry of the Paramount decree or decrees, to which may be added, if plaintiff so desires, an allegation that it intends to rely upon the same pursuant to 15 U.S.C.A. § 16.
No comment or interpretation is to be made with respect to the said decrees.
The motion to strike is granted specifically as follows:
Paragraph 6.a. -- third sentence;
Paragraph 6.e. -- second sentence;
Paragraph 6.f. -- second sentence;
Paragraph 8.c. -- second sentence;
Paragraph 8.d. -- second sentence;
Paragraph 20.a. -- 'in manner as found in United States v. Paramount Pictures (334 U.S. 131, 68 S. Ct. 915, 92 L. Ed. 1260), as hereinafter more ...