The opinion of the court was delivered by: SUGARMAN
American Valve Company brought an action to recover from the United States the sum of $ 27,065.45 as a refund of taxes paid for the years 1942 and 1943. Both parties now move for summary judgment.
The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff, for the years 1942 and 1943, filed income and excess profits tax returns, showing excess profits tax due for 1942 in the sum of $ 75,843.97, and for the year 1943 in the sum of $ 52,185.72. Both sums were ultimately paid to the Collector of Internal Revenue.
During both of these years, the stock in the plaintiff corporation was owned by Samuel Gade and Theodore Guterman, each of whom owned one-third of the stock. The balance of the stock was retained as a Treasury stock.
On July 1, 1943, an agreement was entered into between the corporation and a partnership in which Samuel Gade had a 20% interest and Theodore Guterman had a 15% interest. Other members of the Gade and Guterman families owned the remaining 65% of the partnership. The agreement provided that the corporation was to lease its property to the partnership and the partnership was to pay rent to the corporation for the use of the property.
Thereafter, during the year 1944, as appears from the tax returns filed by the corporation, the corporation received as its only income $ 36,000 in rent from the partnership and $ 1,436.29 from interest on Treasury notes and a refund of an account payable.
During the year 1945, the corporation received as its only income rent in the sum of $ 36,000 from the partnership and interest on Treasury notes in the sum of $ 206.
For each of those years, the corporation filed a Personal Holding Company return, showing a small loss in 1944 and a small profit for 1945.
On June 25, 1947, plaintiff filed claims for refund of taxes paid for the years 1942 and 1943. Upon the disallowance of these claims by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the present action was commenced.
The basis of the claims filed was that during the years 1944 and 1945, plaintiff had accrued excess profits tax credits which it was entitled to carry back to the years 1942 and 1943, respectively, thereby reducing the excess profits tax for the two earlier years and entitling it to a refund.
The defendant's position is that plaintiff may not recover because it was a personal holding company during 1944 and 1945 and hence exempt from excess profits tax in those years. Therefore, it could not accrue excess profits tax credits to be carried back to previous years when it was subject to excess profits tax.
The plaintiff contends that in 1944 and 1945 it was not a personal holding company but, if it was, it nevertheless is entitled to carry back its excess profits credit to 1942 and 1943.
The reasoning of the Court of Claims in Aluminum Products Co. v. United States
that if plaintiff was a personal holding company during 1944 and 1945, it is not entitled to an 'Unused excess profits credit carry-back' because it then would not be a taxpayer within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 710(c)(3)(A) applies here.
The sole issue left in the instant action is whether on the agreed facts the plaintiff was in 1944 and 1945 ...