Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Shoemaker v. Malaxa

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT


decided: February 15, 1957.

THOMAS B. SHOEMAKER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NICOLAI MALAXA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

Appellant sued in the District Court to recover attorney's fees, asserting that he was a resident of the District of Columbia and that the defendant was "analien and a citizen of Roumania." At the conclusion of the trial Judge Murphy entered judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the defendant was a stateless alien in that Roumania had revoked his citizenship in 1948.

For the reasons set forth by Judge Bicks in his opinion in Blair Holdings Corp. v. Rubinstein, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1955, 133 F.Supp. 496, it seems clear that a stateless person, such as Malaxa was conceded to be, is not a citizen or subject of a foreign state within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 1332(a)(2). The complaint was properly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Affirmed.

19570215

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.