Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

UNITED STATES v. NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT NEW YORK.


June 18, 1959.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN and HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Tri-Continental Financial Corporation, A.C. Allyn and Company, Incorporated, American Transportation Enterprises, Inc., Equitable Securities Corporation, Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., The Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., and John W. Clarke & Co., Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: MCGOHEY

McGOHEY, District Judge.

This unusual motion was, an appears on p. 13 of the transcript of the argument on file, joined in by the defendant New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company.

 It is conceded, and I independently find, that there is no genuine dispute of fact. The facts and the issue of law raised by the motion are precisely those set forth and decided on a motion by other defendants in this case for summary judgment in their favor, which was granted.D.C., 170 F.Supp. 562. For the reasons there stated, the instant joint motion by the plaintiff and the defendant New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company for summary judgment in favor of the latter, is herewith granted.

 So ordered.

19590618

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.