Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Dolphin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT


decided: December 11, 1959.

SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, AS CHARTERER IN POSSESSION OF THE P. W. THIRTLE AND AS ASSIGNEE OF BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY, LIBELLANT-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
THE MORANIA DOLPHIN, DOLPHIN TRANSPORTATION CO. AND MORANIA OIL TANKER CORPORATION, CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-APPELLEES, AND THE DALZELLEADER AND EDNA M. MATTON, DALZELLEADER, INC., DALZELL TOWING COMPANY, INC., AND MATTON STEAMBOAT CO., INC., CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS-IMPLEADED

Before MEDINA, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

We find it unnecessary to supplement what is said in Judge Weinfeld's excellent opinion on the subject of the fault of the Thirtle. We affirm the decree against the Dolphin on the ground of her statutory fault in passing the Thirtle despite the fact that she received no response to her signal for permission to pass. We agree with Judge Weinfeld that the Dolphin has not sustained the heavy burden of proving that this statutory violation "could not have contributed to the occurrence." The Pennsylvania, 1873, 86 U.S. 125, 136, 22 L. Ed. 148; Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. The Santiago, 2 Cir., 1946, 155 F.2d 148, 150, note 7.

Affirmed.

19591211

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.