May 23, 1961
MURRAY DULBERG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
SCOVILL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, THE EYELET SPECIALTY COMPANY, THE BRIDGEPORT METAL GOODS MFG. CO., THE RISDON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES, AND ELIZABETH ARDEN SALES CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
After a lengthy trial the district judge filed an exhaustive opinion containing his findings of fact and conclusions of law, 194 F.Supp. 165. On appeal we have carefully examined the massive record and the unusual quantity of exhibits and find no error in the result reached below. We affirm on the opinion of the trial judge.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.