Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Fay

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT.


June 15, 1964

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. CUTHBERT EASTMAN, RELATOR-APPELLEE,
v.
HON. EDWARD M. FAY, AS WARDEN OF GREEN HAVEN PRISON, STORMVILLE, NEW YORK, AND THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

Relator seeks habeas corpus claiming that his confinement under a state court conviction violates the fourth amendment because of an illegal search and seizure. The alleged search and seizure occurred on or about February 25, 1956. Relator's conviction became final on July 23, 1956, when his appeal from the judgment of conviction was dismissed for lack of prosecution. In granting the writ, Judge Tyler held that relator was entitled to relief under Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961), even though relator's conviction became final prior to that decision and prior to the search and seizure that was the subject of the Mapp case*fn1 This court sitting en banc in United States ex rel. Angelet v. Fay, 1964, 333 F.2d 12, held that Mapp is not to be given such retroactive effect.Accordingly the order must be reversed with directions to deny the writ.

Order reversed.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.