Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bullock v. Latham

decided: December 23, 1964.

GILES E. BULLOCK AND KATHERINE D. BULLOCK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
DANA LATHAM, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, AND E.C. COYLE, JR., DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.



Author: Waterman

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

When this case was here before we held that there was jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340 and 2463 and remanded for trial on the sole issue "whether title to the machinery and fixtures is in Giles E. Bullock or E.C. Brown Company." Bullock v. Latham, 306 F.2d 45, 48 (2d Cir. 1962). This task was thoroughly and competently performed by the District Court Judge, who ruled against the taxpayers. We affirm on the basis of his findings of fact and conclusions of law.

19641223

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.