Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Hammond

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT


decided: May 11, 1966.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT HAMMOND AND ROBERT LEWIS, APPELLANTS

Lumbard, Chief Judge, and Waterman and Kaufman, Circuit Judges.

Author: Per Curiam

We affirm in open court the convictions for violation of the narcotics laws, 21 U.S.C. ยงยง 173, 174, entered after a jury trial on May 21, 1965. Appellants argue that the fifteen-month delay between the offense and their arrest violated due process because it was an unnecessary delay which prejudiced their ability to recollect the events in question. Although appellants raised this question at trial the government was prevented from offering any explanation of the delay by defense counsel's successful objection to such explanatory testimony. We adhere to our decision in United States v. Wilson, 2 Cir., 342 F.2d 782, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 860, 86 S. Ct. 119, 15 L. Ed. 2d 98 (1965), that such a delay, in the absence of any other circumstances, does not violate any right of the accused. Ross v. United States, 121 U.S. App. D.C. 233, 349 F.2d 210 (D.C.Cir.1965), cited by appellants and decided subsequent to our decisions, does not persuade us to the contrary.

19660511

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.