Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Crawford

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT


December 14, 1967

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
NATHANIEL CRAWFORD AND WILLIAM EDWARD SHARPE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Before KAUFMAN, ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

After a trial without a jury before Judge Edward Weinfeld of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, appellants were convicted of a narcotics violation under 21 U.S.C. ยงยง 173, 174, and sentenced to five years' imprisonment. The appellants claim several errors in the proceedings below; we have considered these claims and find them without merit. We note, particularly, that Judge Weinfeld found as a fact that before defendant Crawford was asked to consent to a search he was "fully advised" of his constitutional rights. Cf. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966). Moreover, appellants did not argue in the district court that Crawford at that time was not given a proper warning under Miranda, United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F.2d 276 (2d Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied. 383 U.S. 907, 86 S. Ct. 887, 15 L. Ed. 2d 663 (1966).

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

19671214

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.