Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ERNEST ODOM ET AL. v. RUBEN ROSADO ET AL. (05/06/68)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 1968.NY.41493 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 291 N.Y.S.2d 1017; 30 A.D.2d 537 May 6, 1968 ERNEST ODOM ET AL., RESPONDENTS,v.RUBEN ROSADO ET AL., APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (AND ANOTHER TITLE.) Separate appeals, as limited by appellants' separate briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 10, 1967, as, on respondents' motion, set aside the jury verdict insofar as it was in their favor against appellants and granted a new trial to respondents as against appellants. Christ, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Separate appeals, as limited by appellants' separate briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 10, 1967, as, on respondents' motion, set aside the jury verdict insofar as it was in their favor against appellants and granted a new trial to respondents as against appellants.

Christ, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

In our opinion the jury did not render inconsistent verdicts. On the basis of the record presented we find that the award of $100 to plaintiff Odom was not inadequate.

Disposition

 Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, motion denied and said parts of the verdict reinstated.

19680506

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.