Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

DOROTHY LISTENGART v. GEORGE H. ELL (05/06/68)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 1968.NY.41503 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 291 N.Y.S.2d 271; 30 A.D.2d 536 May 6, 1968 DOROTHY LISTENGART, RESPONDENT,v.GEORGE H. ELL, APPELLANT (AND A THIRD-PARTY ACTION.) In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 28, 1967, in favor of plaintiff upon a jury verdict. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 28, 1967, in favor of plaintiff upon a jury verdict.

Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

It was error for the trial court to charge the jury that defendant had the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence that the collision between the vehicles occurred because of defective brakes on defendant's automobile which could not have been discovered by defendant before the collision. Under the doctrine of Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp. (17 N.Y.2d 132), the burden of going forward with proof shifts to the defendant to explain that the cause of the accident was due to conditions beyond his control, once the plaintiff establishes that there is a reasonable inference that the collision occurred due to the defendant's fault. On the whole case, however, the burden of proof remains on the plaintiff to establish the negligence of the defendant. The charge was excepted to by defendant's counsel and a correct charge was requested by him. Under these circumstances, a new trial is required.

Disposition

 Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial directed, with costs to abide the event. The findings of fact are affirmed.

19680506

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.