Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HARRY T. WHITLEY v. PACIFIC INDUSTRIES (06/05/68)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK 1968.NY.41967 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 239 N.E.2d 207; 22 N.Y.2d 726 decided: June 5, 1968. HARRY T. WHITLEY, APPELLANT,v.PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS Whitley v. Pacific Ind., 28 A.D.2d 147, affirmed. Samuel M. Sprafkin and Mandel M. Einhorn for appellant. James P. O'Neill and James J. Dolan for Pacific Industries, Inc., and Warner B. Bishop, respondents. Leonard S. Leaman for Jakob Isbrandtsen, respondent. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Breitel. Judges Keating and Jasen dissent in part.


Whitley v. Pacific Ind., Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Breitel. Judges Keating and Jasen dissent in part.

 Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division. Judges Keating and Jasen dissent in part and vote to reverse and deny the motion for summary judgment in favor of the corporate defendant, Pacific Industries, Inc., in the following memorandum: We agree with the majority that plaintiff's affidavits are insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the individual defendants. As to the corporate defendant, however, issues are sufficiently stated to require a trial as to whether plaintiff's employment was one terminable at will.

19680605

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.