Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SAMUEL M. SPRAFKIN v. PACIFIC INDUSTRIES (06/11/68)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT


June 11, 1968

SAMUEL M. SPRAFKIN, APPELLANT,
v.
PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC., RESPONDENT

Concur -- Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer, Capozzoli and McNally, JJ.

Plaintiff sues in quantum meruit for legal services. The services consisted of collection of an overdue account from a debtor on the verge of bankruptcy and required, among other things, extensive negotiations with other creditors. Defendant does not deny the hiring nor the performance of services but denies knowledge of the extent of the services rendered and their value. Defendant's conduct as revealed in the affidavits describes one long course of equivocation and obfuscation, which conduct was ably seconded by its legal representatives. This determination will be beneficial to them, as it will enable them to discover what they profess to be ignorant of at a far earlier date than would otherwise be expected. As to the bill of particulars, plaintiff has not shown prejudice which is a necessary element in an appeal of this character(Gevinson v. KirkebyNatus Corp., 26 A.D.2d 71, 77).

Disposition

Order entered February 9, 1968, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant summary judgment to plaintiff and to direct an assessment of damages, and otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant.

19680611

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.