Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

RUTH M. KENT v. ARTHUR L. WINN (06/24/68)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT


June 24, 1968

RUTH M. KENT, RESPONDENT,
v.
ARTHUR L. WINN, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS

Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

In our opinion, therefore, the deed was a nullity. Furthermore, a sale by the State of certain parcels of land by letters patent to respondent's husband did not convey the subject premises, as the maps which describe the area conveyed indicate that there was no transfer of the bed of First Street. Finally, as the party seeking relief, it was incumbent on respondent to sustain her action on the strength of her own title(Beers v. Hotchkiss, 256 N. Y. 41, 45). Since she has not done so, it is our opinion that the trial court erred in granting her the relief requested.

19680624

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.