Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

CLARENCE J. VERMILYEA v. ROGER H. LEE ET AL. (07/08/68)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 1968.NY.42529 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 293 N.Y.S.2d 708; 30 A.D.2d 830 July 8, 1968 CLARENCE J. VERMILYEA, AN INFANT BY CATHERINE VERMILYEA, HIS PARENT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS,v.ROGER H. LEE ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND LAWRENCE SCULLY, APPELLANT In an automobile negligence action to recover damages, defendant Lawrence Scully appeals from order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 18, 1967, which denied his motion, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


In an automobile negligence action to recover damages, defendant Lawrence Scully appeals from order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 18, 1967, which denied his motion, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him.

Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

In our opinion, the papers submitted herein clearly establish that nothing in appellant's conduct can be construed as having been a proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries. Therefore, there can be no liability on his part and no triable issue as to whether he was negligent (see Rivera v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.2d 856).

Disposition

 Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

19680708

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.