Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PEOPLE STATE NEW YORK v. HARRY WEIS (07/22/68)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT


July 22, 1968

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v.
HARRY WEIS, APPELLANT

Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., concurs.

In the circumstances, peculiar to this case, we think that Weis' motion for a separate trial should have been granted (cf. Bruton v. United States 391, U. S. 123).

Martuscello, J., concurs, with the following memorandum:

I vote for reversal and a new trial for the reasons set forth in the majority's memorandum and also because the trial judge erred when, over objection by appellant, Weis, he (1) allowed into evidence the "hush puppy" shoes and the fishing knife and (2) permitted Weis' wife, as a witness for the People, to testify to a conversation had with the co-defendant, Maselli, on March 18, 1966. The errors thus committed were prejudicial. They are more fully discussed in my dissenting memorandum in People v. Maselli (30 A.D.2d 871).

19680722

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.