Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PEOPLE STATE NEW YORK v. JAMES CONILIO (11/21/68)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK 1968.NY.43625 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 243 N.E.2d 751; 23 N.Y.2d 701 decided: November 21, 1968. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,v.JAMES CONILIO, APPELLANT People v. Conilio, 28 A.D.2d 823, modified. Arnold E. Wallach for appellant. Burton B. Roberts, Acting District Attorney (Roy Broudny of counsel), for respondent. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.


People v. Conilio, Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.

 Judgment modified to the extent of remitting the case to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, and directing a de novo hearing on the issue of voluntariness of the confession introduced as a part of the People's case at the trial and, as so modified, affirmed. Where, as in the present case, the record clearly indicates that the Judge conducting the Huntley hearing specifically refused or failed to consider relevant evidence adduced on the issue of voluntariness, it cannot be said that a defendant has been afforded an opportunity to have a fair and reliable determination on that issue (Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 377). Under such circumstances, a new Huntley hearing is mandated.

19681121

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.