Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MATTER ANAK WINE & LIQUOR CO. v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL. (11/27/68)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK 1968.NY.43714 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 243 N.E.2d 757; 23 N.Y.2d 710 decided: November 27, 1968. IN THE MATTER OF ANAK WINE & LIQUOR CO., INC., APPELLANT,v.NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL., RESPONDENTS Matter of Anak Wine & Liq. Co. v. New York State Liq. Auth., 30 A.D.2d 962, affirmed. Robert W. Corcoran for appellant. Hyman Amsel and Joseph S. Ryan for State Liquor Authority and another, respondents. David J. Eisenberg for Murray Wine & Liquor, Inc., respondent. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent.


Matter of Anak Wine & Liq. Co. v. New York State Liq. Auth., 30 A.D.2d 962, affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent.

 Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the order and judgment of Special Term upon the ground that the finding of the State Liquor Authority that the public convenience and advantage will be served by the granting of another retail liquor store license in this dilapidated, poverty stricken, disease and crime-ridden neighborhood is without support in the record.

19681127

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.