Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MATTER KAROL LUMBER CORP. v. CITY NEW YORK (01/13/69)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 1969.NY.40118 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 297 N.Y.S.2d 283; 31 A.D.2d 747 January 13, 1969 IN THE MATTER OF KAROL LUMBER CORP., APPELLANT,v.CITY OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT In a proceeding to review and annul a determination of the Department of Buildings of the City of New York which directed demolition of an unsafe and dangerous building, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 23, 1968, which, inter alia, denied the petition. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.


In a proceeding to review and annul a determination of the Department of Buildings of the City of New York which directed demolition of an unsafe and dangerous building, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 23, 1968, which, inter alia, denied the petition.

Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

This proceeding does not lie because a judicial determination was made in a proceeding concluded on November 20, 1967, after trial pursuant to section C26-197.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. In that proceeding, findings of fact and law were made that the structure was unsafe and dangerous. By the terms of the statute that judicial determination is "final". We do not reach the question whether the word "final" in the statute precludes appellate review of the November 20, 1967 determination, because no appeal was taken therefrom and no review was sought. In that sense the November 20, 1967 determination is "final" and may not be reviewed in this independent "proceeding". The Department of Buildings must be permitted under section C26-198.0 to "proceed to execute" the precept forthwith.

Disposition

 Judgment affirmed, without costs.

19690113

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.