Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

FRANK A. KRUPICKA v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY ET AL. (03/03/69)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT


March 3, 1969

FRANK A. KRUPICKA, RESPONDENT,
v.
NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS. ROBERT A. PABIAN ET AL., APPELLANTS

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff's former attorneys appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 15, 1967, which denied their application for a fee.

Hopkins, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

The findings of fact below are not affirmed. The issue of appellants' right to compensation was decided largely upon affidavits. The issue should be resolved only after a hearing in which sworn testimony and other evidence is received, subject to cross-examination (Matter of Weitling, 266 N. Y. 184; Matter of Long, 287 N. Y. 449). Appellants' right to compensation revolves around questions of judgment in prosecuting the action. This is clearly distinguishable from Automatic Bedding Corp. v. Ortner (26 A.D.2d 664) where the discharged attorneys' undisclosed conflict of interest was apparent upon the papers.

Disposition

Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and application remanded to said court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

19690303

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.