Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
MATTER KINGSBORO LIQUORS v. STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL. (03/06/69)
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
1969.NY.40724 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 248 N.E.2d 26; 24 N.Y.2d 774
decided: March 6, 1969.
IN THE MATTER OF KINGSBORO LIQUORS, INC., APPELLANT,v.STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Matter of Kingsboro Liqs. v. State Liq. Auth., 29 A.D.2d 864, affirmed.
Solomon B. Terkeltoub for appellant.
Benjamin Laskin and Hyman Amsel for State Liquor Authority, respondent.
No appearance for Jome Wines & Liquors, Inc., respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent.
Matter of Kingsboro Liqs. v. State Liq. Auth., 29 A.D.2d 864, affirmed.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent.
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Authority; no opinion. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent and vote to reverse on the ground there was no rational basis for the finding of the State Liquor Authority that public advantage and convenience would be served by the granting of the license.