Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MATTER KINGSBORO LIQUORS v. STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL. (03/06/69)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK 1969.NY.40724 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 248 N.E.2d 26; 24 N.Y.2d 774 decided: March 6, 1969. IN THE MATTER OF KINGSBORO LIQUORS, INC., APPELLANT,v.STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL., RESPONDENTS Matter of Kingsboro Liqs. v. State Liq. Auth., 29 A.D.2d 864, affirmed. Solomon B. Terkeltoub for appellant. Benjamin Laskin and Hyman Amsel for State Liquor Authority, respondent. No appearance for Jome Wines & Liquors, Inc., respondent. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent.


Matter of Kingsboro Liqs. v. State Liq. Auth., 29 A.D.2d 864, affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent.

 Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Authority; no opinion. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent and vote to reverse on the ground there was no rational basis for the finding of the State Liquor Authority that public advantage and convenience would be served by the granting of the license.

19690306

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.