Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

GEORGE D. HUDSON v. BROOKFIELD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (04/09/69)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK 1969.NY.41039 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 248 N.E.2d 445; 24 N.Y.2d 811 decided: April 9, 1969. GEORGE D. HUDSON, APPELLANT,v.BROOKFIELD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., RESPONDENT Hudson v. Brookfield Constr. Co., 28 A.D.2d 1207, affirmed. George D. Hudson, pro se, for appellant. Vincent T. Aiello and Frank J. Amabile for respondent. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen. Judges Burke, Keating and Breitel dissent.


Hudson v. Brookfield Constr. Co., Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen. Judges Burke, Keating and Breitel dissent.

 No opinion.

Disposition

Order affirmed, without costs ( Kowalsky v. Conreco Co., 264 N. Y. 125; Senkbeil v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 18 N.Y.2d 789, affg. 23 A.D.2d 587, 589).

Judges Burke, Keating and Breitel dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum: Plaintiff's work was not concerned with the use or correction of the hazardous condition which caused the accident. Hence, the rule of the Kowalsky case (264 N. Y. 125) is not applicable. There was, therefore, an issue of fact to submit to the jury.

19690409

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.