Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ROSARIA DE VITO ET AL. v. IMPERIAL TOWER (04/14/69)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 1969.NY.41119 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 300 N.Y.S.2d 523; 32 A.D.2d 537 April 14, 1969 ROSARIA DE VITO ET AL., RESPONDENTS,v.IMPERIAL TOWER, INC., APPELLANT In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff wife and for loss of services and medical expenses incurred by plaintiff husband, defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 21, 1968 in favor of plaintiffs upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability. Brennan, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff wife and for loss of services and medical expenses incurred by plaintiff husband, defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 21, 1968 in favor of plaintiffs upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability.

Brennan, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

In our opinion, plaintiffs' proof, uncontroverted by defendant, was sufficient to establish actionable negligence on the part of defendant (cf. Epstein v. Sixty Wall Tower, 27 A.D.2d 988).

Disposition

 Judgment affirmed, with costs.

19690414

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.