Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PEOPLE STATE NEW YORK v. NICHOLAS FINO (05/28/69)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK 1969.NY.41771 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 250 N.E.2d 245; 24 N.Y.2d 1020 decided: May 28, 1969. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT,v.NICHOLAS FINO, RESPONDENT; THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT, V. NICHOLAS MAURO, RESPONDENT; THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT, V. RALPH VELOCCI, RESPONDENT People v. Fino, 29 A.D.2d 227, affirmed. Michael F. Dillon, District Attorney (Peter J. Notaro of counsel), for appellant. Peter L. Parrino for Nicholas Fino, respondent. Herald Price Fahringer for Nicholas Mauro, respondent. Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene W. Salisbury for Ralph Velocci, respondent. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen.


People v. Fino, Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen.

 The question of defendants' standing to challenge the validity of telephone interception orders which supported the search warrant -- the sole ground for reversal suggested in this court by the People -- was not raised at Trial Term or at the Appellate Division. No special circumstance is shown why the question should be permitted to be raised now for the first time. No opinion.

Disposition

Orders affirmed.

19690528

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.