Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MATTER JAMES BLAKE AND JAMES P. EDSTROM v. FRANK S. HOGAN (06/02/69)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK


decided: June 2, 1969.

IN THE MATTER OF JAMES BLAKE AND JAMES P. EDSTROM, APPELLANTS
v.
FRANK S. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR NEW YORK COUNTY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Matter of Blake v. Hogan, 32 A.D.2d 611, affirmed.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen concur.

 Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The record, in our view, supports the conclusion -- reached by the Appellate Division when it denied the petitioners-appellants' motion in the criminal case to dismiss the indictment -- that there had been no denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial in view of the fact that they had acquiesced in the delay complained of. On the procedural issue, we do not believe that the extraordinary remedy of prohibition is proper under the circumstances of this case.

Disposition

Order affirmed.

19690602

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.