Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MATTER JAMES T. MOLLOY v. JAMES R. LAWLEY ET AL. (06/12/69)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK 1969.NY.42013 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 250 N.E.2d 718; 25 N.Y.2d 814 decided: June 12, 1969. IN THE MATTER OF JAMES T. MOLLOY, APPELLANT,v.JAMES R. LAWLEY ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF ERIE COUNTY, AND BARBARA M. SIMS, RESPONDENT; IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL F. DILLON, APPELLANT, V. JAMES R. LAWLEY ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF ERIE COUNTY, AND BARBARA M. SIMS, RESPONDENT Matter of Molloy v. Lawley, 32 A.D.2d 175, reversed. Thomas P. Flaherty for appellants. William Sims for respondent. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen.


Matter of Molloy v. Lawley, Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen.

 Order reversed, without costs, and the order of Special Term reinstated in the following memorandum: Respondent Sims by the position taken upon the trial limited the issues to the single point of law raised by motion and unequivocally withdrew from the proceeding and elected not to contest the ensuing issues of fact. Consequently, there was no jurisdiction to review any question other than the point of law raised. Moreover, by her conduct respondent prevented petitioners from establishing their contentions as to the invalidity of additional signatures.

19690612

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.