Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ANNA ZIENTARA v. JOSEPH ZIENTARA (06/18/69)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 1969.NY.42078 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 302 N.Y.S.2d 294; 32 A.D.2d 822 June 18, 1969 ANNA ZIENTARA, APPELLANT,v.JOSEPH ZIENTARA, RESPONDENT In an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 27, 1969, which dismissed her complaint after a non-jury trial. 59 Misc. 2d 344. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


In an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 27, 1969, which dismissed her complaint after a non-jury trial. 59 Misc. 2d 344.

Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

In 1959 plaintiff wife obtained a decree of separation from defendant husband. On September 19, 1968 the wife brought this action for divorce pursuant to subdivision (5) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law. In his answer, the husband admitted the allegations of the complaint and contested only the claims for alimony and a counsel fee. Nevertheless, the trial court dismissed the complaint, after trial, on the ground that subdivision (5) of section 170 (enacted in 1966) is not retroactive and does not apply where the separation decree was obtained prior to the enactment of this statute. In Schacht v. Schacht (32 A.D.2d 201) we have held that this statute is retroactive and does apply where the separation decree was obtained prior to the statute's enactment. Consequently, the dismissal of the complaint in this action, on the ground of non-retroactivity of the statute, was incorrect. The judgment must therefore be reversed and a new trial granted.

Disposition

 Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and new trial granted. The findings of fact below have not been affirmed.

19690618

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.