Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PEOPLE STATE NEW YORK v. BRIAN RICE AND ROBERT MCAULIFFE (07/01/69)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK 1969.NY.42336 <http://www.versuslaw.com>; 250 N.E.2d 721; 25 N.Y.2d 822 decided: July 1, 1969. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,v.BRIAN RICE AND ROBERT MCAULIFFE, APPELLANTS People v. McAuliffe, 28 A.D.2d 959, affirmed. John A. Cimarosa for Brian Rice, appellant. M. Morton Edmiston, Jr. for Robert McAuliffe, appellant. Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (James J. Duggan of counsel), for respondent. Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen concur.


People v. McAuliffe, Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen concur.

 Memorandum. Although a promise was made to defendant McAuliffe that the other counts and the separate felony indictment be dismissed, such a dismissal stands only as a part of an entire plea arrangement. If the arrangement be undone then the People and the defendant are entitled to be restored to the status obtaining before the plea. On this view it makes no difference to defendant whether the other counts are dismissed, or as happened in this case, deemed covered by the plea. Unless the plea is vacated he cannot be tried on the remaining counts of the indictment and the separate indictment.

Disposition

Judgments affirmed in a memorandum.

19690701

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.