Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PEOPLE STATE NEW YORK v. SOLOMON VANN (09/25/69)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK


decided: September 25, 1969.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v.
SOLOMON VANN, JR., APPELLANT

Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of the defendant under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied when the Trial Judge refused to apply Escobedo v. Illinois (378 U.S. 478) in determining the voluntariness of defendant's statements. The Court of Appeals considered the defendant's argument and held that the trial court correctly found Escobedo to be inapplicable to the facts of this case and, therefore, that there was no violation of defendant's constitution rights. [See 25 N.Y.2d 753.]

Disposition

Motion to amend remittitur granted.

19690925

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.