Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PEOPLE STATE NEW YORK v. ALFREDO ORTIZ AND CARLOS ORTIZ (09/25/69)

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK


decided: September 25, 1969.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v.
ALFREDO ORTIZ AND CARLOS ORTIZ, APPELLANTS

Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States: In view of the fact that upon their joint trial the defendants-appellants and a third co-defendant made confessions in which each implicated the others and that those confessions were admitted into evidence, the defendants-appellants argue that they were denied their constitutional right of confrontation under the Sixth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that, although the receipt in evidence of the confessions of their co-defendants was error, the error was not of constitutional dimension in light of the fact that all of the defendants confessed. [See 25 N.Y.2d 863.]

Disposition

Motion by appellant Carlos Ortiz to amend remittitur granted.

19690925

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.