Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

KATHLEEN BOTTALICO ET AL. v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY (12/11/69)

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT


December 11, 1969

KATHLEEN BOTTALICO ET AL., RESPONDENTS,
v.
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT

Concur -- Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewich and McNally, JJ.

If plaintiffs elect to examine by open commission, the parties shall pay their respective expenses, which shall be taxed as costs by the prevailing party. Otherwise the order is affirmed. The requirement that witnesses travel a thousand miles is onerous and likely unnecessary. If the witnesses should come to New York for the trial or for any reason prior thereto, plaintiffs shall be advised beforehand and accorded the opportunity of conducting the examination directed. (See Pakter v. Lilly & Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Piel v. Lilly & Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Winds v. Hydropress, 279 App. Div. 1005.) Defendant's brief offers to submit the witnesses for examination in New York City about one week before trial.

Disposition

Order entered May 20, 1969, denying defendant's motion for a protective order, unanimously modified on the facts and the law, without costs or disbursements, to provide that the examination of defendant's employees shall be in Jacksonville, Florida, and, at the election of plaintiffs, shall be by written interrogatories or open commission.

19691211

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.