Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

FIRST AMERICAN CTR. SECS. LITIG. v. FIRST AMERICAN

October 13, 1992

IN RE FIRST AMERICAN CENTER SECURITIES LITIGATION (ALL ACTIONS) ROBERT D. DILLEY and RICHARD A. BIORN, On Behalf of Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, against FIRST AMERICAN CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SHEARSON LEHMAN BROTHERS INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON INC., SHEARSON LEHMAN FIRST AMERICAN CENTER, INC., A. GEORGE KALLOP, PAUL W. PERKINS, GARY D. GALLAGHER, WILLIAM M. KAHN, ROBERT F. GREENWALD, and MARSHALL AND STEVENS INCORPORATED, Defendants.


The opinion of the court was delivered by: CHARLES L. BRIEANT

Memorandum & Order

 (CORRECTED)

 Brieant, Chief Judge

 On July 10, 1991, defendants Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., First American Center Limited Partnership, Shearson Lehman First American Center Inc., A. George Kallop, Paul W. Perkins, Cary D. Gallagher, William M. Kahn, and Robert F. Greenwald (hereinafter referred to as the "Shearson defendants") moved to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint (hereinafter "the Complaint") pursuant to Rule 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By separate motion, filed on July 11, 1991, defendant Marshall & Stevens Incorporated sought the same relief pursuant to Rules 9(b), 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).

 This Court heard oral argument on the motions on August 5, 1991 and decision on the motions was deferred pending our Court of Appeals reexamination of its decision in Welch v. Cadre Capital, 923 F.2d 989 (2d Cir. 1991) ("Welch I"), which the Supreme Court remanded sub nom. Northwest Savings Bank PaSa v. Welch, 115 L. Ed. 2d 1048, 111 S. Ct. 2882 (1991), for reconsideration in light of its decisions in Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson, 115 L. Ed. 2d 321, 111 S. Ct. 2773 (1991), and James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia, 115 L. Ed. 2d 481, 111 S. Ct. 2439 (1991). *fn1"

 This litigation arises out of the sale of approximately $ 14 million dollars of units in First American Center Limited Partnership, a failed real estate limited partnership whose principal asset was a 28-story commercial office building, First American Center, in Nashville, Tennessee. Complaint, P 24. The property was financed in part through a $ 35 million non-recourse first mortgage loan. Complaint, P 26. The total debt-financing for the acquisition exceeded $ 40 million dollars. Complaint, P 27. Limited partnership interests were sold by defendant Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. through the distribution of a Private Placement Memorandum dated March 31, 1986 that contained among others statements, an appraisal of the value of First American Center prepared by defendant Marshall and Stevens, Incorporated. See Complaint P 30.

 On November 3, 1989, unit investors were notified in writing that First American Bank of Nashville, which occupied 53 % of the property's rentable square footage, had terminated its lease and vacated its space in First American Center. Complaint, P 70. By letter dated February 16, 1990, the unit holders were notified that "the potential loss of the Property put the LIMITED PARTNERS' investment 'at serious risk of total loss.'" Complaint, P 74. On July 13, 1990, investors in First American Center Limited Partnership were informed that all of the partnership's assets had been lost, and that title to the First American Center property had been transferred to the first mortgage lender effective July 1, 1990. Complaint, P 78.

 Plaintiffs in the Complaint allege that First American Center Limited Partnership units were offered and sold to the investing public by way of misrepresentations and omissions of material fact which concealed from purchasers important information regarding the operation and performance of First American Center and the potential profitability and true risks of the investment. In particular, plaintiffs assert claims against the Shearson defendants for violations of federal securities law, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [ 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder (Count I), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d) (Count II), as well as claims for common law fraud (Count III), negligent misrepresentations (Count IV), negligence (Count V) and breach of fiduciary duty (Count VI), arising out of the offer and sale of limited partnership interests in First American Center Limited Partnership.

 The substantive allegations with respect to defendant Marshall and Stevens are that Marshall and Stevens prepared an appraisal for the property by which it represented that First American had a fair market value of $ 54,000,000 million dollars as of January 6, 1986 and that this appraisal was knowingly and/or recklessly inflated. Based on these factual allegations, plaintiffs allege that defendant Marshall and Stevens is liable for violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Count I), as well for the common law torts of fraud (Count III), negligent misrepresentation (Count IV), negligence (Count V) and professional negligence (Count VIII).

 Originally named in the Complaint as a defendant was KPMG Peat Marwick, alleged to be the independent auditor of First American Center Limited Partnership. By letter dated July 3, 1991, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this defendant from the action without prejudice and, by Memorandum & Order dated July 10, 1991, this Court concluded that the dismissal of Peat Marwick would not prejudice the class. See Doc. Nos. 7, 8.

 On August 31, 1992, this Court provisionally certified a plaintiff class *fn2" and preliminarily approved a Class Action Settlement Agreement between the proposed Settlement Class, represented by plaintiffs Robert D. Dilley and Richard A. Biorn, and the Shearson defendants. See Doc. No. 31. On October 21, 1992, the Court held a hearing to consider final approval of the proposed settlement and an Order and Judgment of Final Settlement Approval was filed on the same date. See Doc. No. 41. The Settlement Agreement is not global, as it fails to address the claims pleaded against Marshall and Stevens.

 By letters dated August 14 and August 18, 1992, counsel for plaintiffs and defendant Marshall and Stevens, Inc., respectively, request that this Court rule on defendant Marshall and Stevens' motion to dismiss. See Doc. Nos. 32, 33. The motion was marked fully submitted, decision reserved on September 15, 1992, the date of the last submission by counsel. This constitutes the decision of the Court.

 On November 27, 1991, however, Congress enacted Section 27A of the Exchange Act, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, § 476, Publ. L. No. 102-242, 105 Stat. 2236, which was signed into law by the President on December 19, 1991. Section 27A provides:

 (a) Effect on Pending Causes of Action. The limitation period for any private civil action implied under Section 10(b) of this Act that was commenced on or before June 19, 1991, shall be the limitation period provided by the laws applicable in the jurisdiction, including principles of retroactivity, as such laws existed on June 19, 1991.

 (b) Effect on Dismissed Causes of Action. Any private civil action implied under Section 10(b) of this Act that was ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.