Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HERTZOG v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA

April 5, 1994

HERTZOG, CALAMARI & GLEASON, Plaintiff,
v.
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant.


HAIGHT, JR.


The opinion of the court was delivered by: CHARLES S. HAIGHT, JR.

HAIGHT, District Judge:

 Defendant's motion to compel discovery is denied.

 Under the law of this circuit a partnership, like a corporation, cannot appear pro se. It must appear through an attorney admitted to practice. Eagle Associates v. Bank of Montreal, 926 F.2d 1305 (2d Cir. 1991).

 A corporation may appear through retained outside counsel or by in-house counsel on the corporate payroll. It is well settled that the attorney-client privilege applies to communications between the corporation and its attorneys, whether corporate staff counsel or outside counsel. Rossi v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York, 73 N.Y.2d 588, 592, 542 N.Y.S.2d 508, 540 N.E.2d 703 (Ct.App. 1989). The privilege attaches to communications with in-house counsel if the individual in question is acting as an attorney, rather than as a participant in the underlying events. Bruce v. Christian, 113 F.R.D. 554, 560 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

 No principled reason appears for denying a comparable attorney-client privilege to a law partnership which elects to use a partner or associate as counsel of record in a litigated matter. That partner or associate is the functional equivalent of a corporate staff attorney representing a corporate employer. So long as the individual in question is acting only as an attorney, the privilege attaches.

 Because that is the circumstance in the case at bar, the plaintiff firm is entitled to invoke the privilege, and defendant's motion to compel is denied.

 It is SO ORDERED.

 Dated: New York, New York

 April 5, 1994

 CHARLES S. HAIGHT, JR.

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19940405

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.