The opinion of the court was delivered by: KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, D.J.:
Plaintiff David Gerber ("Gerber") seeks interim relief from the decision of Secretary of Health and Human Services (the "Secretary") to withhold $ 50 from Gerber's monthly disability benefits during the pendency of an overpayment dispute. Gerber moves for an order directing the Secretary to stop withholding any part of his benefits at least until a final determination is made as to the liability for the overpayment. The Secretary argues that interim relief must be denied and Gerber's complaint must be dismissed pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) since the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the dispute. For the following reasons, Gerber's application is granted.
Gerber first applied for Social Security Disability Insurance ("SSD") on March 25, 1981 on the basis of a mental disorder. This application was denied. He did not appeal the denial. Until 1985, Gerber apparently continuously, but unsuccessfully, attempted to return to the work force. (Compl., Apps. A-C).
On July 3, 1985, Gerber again applied for SSD on the basis of a mental disorder and epilepsy. (Compl., App. D). The Secretary determined that Gerber was disabled and hence, entitled to disability benefits starting as of May 1985. (Compl., App. E). Gerber began to receive monthly benefits in November 1985, and received $ 2,040.84 in retroactive benefits for the period of May to October 1985. (Machler Dec. P 4).
In January 1988, Gerber again attempted a return to the workforce. (Compl., App. F). Gerber submitted a completed activity report in May 1988, notifying the local Social Security Office of his efforts. (Gerber Aff. PP 10-13). As a result, the local Social Security Office set up a Trial Work Period Diary.
(Compl., App. F). The office told Gerber that his eligibility and benefits would continue for nine months in which he worked. The office also told Gerber that an extended period of eligibility would follow the conclusion of his trial work period. During this extended period of eligibility, Gerber was informed that he would still receive benefits for months in which he did not work. (Gerber Aff. PP 10-13, and 24). See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1592(a).
On June 14, 1988, pursuant to the relief ordered by the court in City of New York v. Heckler, 578 F. Supp. 1109 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 742 F.2d 729 (2d Cir. 1984), aff'd sub nom., Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 90 L. Ed. 2d 462, 106 S. Ct. 2022 (1986), the Secretary reopened Gerber's 1981 SSD application. The notification stated this would not affect Gerber's current benefits. (Compl., App. G). In Bowen, the District Court found that the Social Security Administration ("SSA") had consistently, and unlawfully, denied SSD to mentally disabled claimants. "The court stated that evidence of the 'fixed clandestine policy against those with mental illness' was overwhelming." Bowen, 476 U.S. at 475. To remedy the harm resulting from SSA's policy, "the District Court ordered the Secretary to reopen the decisions denying or terminating benefits, and to redetermine eligibility." Id. at 476. Since Gerber had been denied benefits for mental disability when he first applied, his 1981 application was reopened.
As part of re-evaluation process, the SSA required Gerber to complete a work activity report from 1981 to 1985. He did so on July 27, 1988 and reported five work attempts during that period. (Compl., App. C). On October 26, 1988, the Secretary determined that Gerber should have received disability benefits as of December 1980, and, as a result, paid Gerber $ 23,265 in retroactive benefits in July 1989. (Compl., App. H).
In December 1988, Gerber's employment terminated. He has not worked since. (Gerber Aff. §§ 16-17). Gerber reported this to the local Social Security Office and was informed that his benefits would be fully restored. Id.
On April 29, 1991, three years after Gerber filed the required work activity report, the Secretary retroactively terminated Mr. Gerber's benefits as of April 1988 and levied $ 18,066.40 in overpaid benefits against him. (Compl., App. J). The Secretary reasoned that since Gerber's 1981 application was re-opened and accepted, his trial work period actually began in March 1981 rather than May 1985. In calculating the amount of months worked by Gerber, the Secretary included the five times Gerber attempted to work from 1981 through 1985. In so doing, the Secretary determined that Gerber had exhausted the nine month trial work period even before he filed his 1985 application for benefits. As a result, the Secretary determined that Gerber was not eligible for SSD during a major part of the 1981-85 period.
Gerber did not appeal the overpayment decision, but rather, upon the advice of the SSA, Gerber filed a new application for benefits.
(Gerber Aff. P 29; Compl., App. K). On December 28, 1991 the SSA retroactively granted Gerber disability benefits from March 1990. Gerber began receiving monthly benefits in January 1992 and continues to receive benefits from this third application. (Compl., App. M).
To offset the alleged benefits overpayment of $ 18,066, however, the SSA withheld benefits that had accrued from March 1990 until April 1991. The SSA also began deducting $ 50 a month from the benefits to further reduce the alleged overpayment to Gerber. Gerber's request for a waiver of the recovery of the overpayment was initially denied on August 23, 1991 (Compl., App. L) and then again on March 9, 1992 (Compl., App. O). On May 14, 1992 Gerber acknowledged an outstanding overpayment of $ 5,058.90 and agreed to the $ 50 monthly deduction. (Machler Dec., Ex. 2).
As a result, Gerber requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") which was held on November 5, 1992. By decision dated January 7, 1993, Judge Jacobs found that Gerber was not overpaid. In so ruling, Judge Jacobs reasoned that any services performed by Gerber were unsuccessful work attempts and that his ...