The opinion of the court was delivered by: PECK
ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge:
To the Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge:
For the reasons set forth below, I recommend that the Court sua sponte dismiss pro se plaintiff Dacius Thomas' claim against Westchester County Department of Corrections for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
The pro se complaint alleges that Corrections Officer Slensby punched, kicked and beat Mr. Thomas on October 26, 1996, causing serious injury, mental anguish and emotional distress. The complaint seeks $ 2 million in damages against defendants jointly and severally, and an additional $ 1 million in punitive damages. The complaint contains no allegations as to Westchester County Department of Corrections; the only reference to it is in the caption (and indirectly by the reference to "defendants" in the relief sections).
The complaint is dated December 19, 1996 and was received by the Court's Pro Se Office on January 6, 1997. See Toliver v. County of Sullivan, 841 F.2d 41, 42 (2d Cir. 1988) (pro se complaint deemed filed when received by the pro se office); Wright v. Nunez, 950 F. Supp. 610, 611 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (Peck, M.J.) (same); McCray v. Kralik, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9474, 1996 WL 378273 at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 1, 1996) (Peck, M.J.) (same).
The Prison Litigation Reform Act (the "PLRA" or the "Act"), which was signed into law by President Clinton on April 26, 1996, significantly altered a prisoner's right to bring civil actions in forma pauperis. The PLRA amended 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to require the Court sua sponte to dismiss the case at any time if the action or any claim "fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (as amended); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
Thomas' complaint is totally silent as to defendant Westchester County Department of Corrections. The complaint therefore fails to state a claim as to that defendant. Plaintiff Thomas should be permitted to amend his complaint if he can assert facts to state a claim against the Westchester County Department of Corrections. See, e.g., Wright v. Nunez, 950 F. Supp. at 612; McCray v. Kralik, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9474, 1996 WL 378273 at *4 (citing Soto v. Walker, 44 F.3d 169, 173 & n.5 (2d Cir. 1995) (citing Branum v. Clark, 927 F.2d 698, 705 (2d Cir. 1991))).
For the reasons set forth above, I recommend that the Court sua sponte dismiss the complaint against defendant Westchester County Department of Corrections for failure to state a claim and as frivolous, without prejudice to Thomas filing an amended complaint within 30 days.
Pursuant to the PLRA, defendant Correction Officer Slensby is directed to respond to the complaint (by answer or motion) after he is served. Plaintiff Thomas is to serve this Report and Recommendation on defendant Slensby along with the summons and complaint (or on their counsel if defendants have already been served). Plaintiff Thomas is reminded that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), he must arrange with ...