Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Buy This Entire Record For
COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA v. NYNEX CORP.
June 4, 2002
COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO AND SUSAN M. ARCHURI, PATRICK RAWLINS, SUSAN MANCHESTER, MICHELENE BERNARDON, PATRICIA SHANLEY, DIANE MANFREDI, AND SANDRA PILECKAS, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
NYNEX CORPORATION, NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, EMPIRE CITY SUBWAY COMPANY (LIMITED), THE SICKNESS AND ACCIDENT DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN OF NEW YORK TELEPHONE AND EMPIRE CITY SUBWAY COMPANY (LIMITED), THE NYNEX SICKNESS AND ACCIDENT DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN, THE EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT COMMITTEE OF NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY AND EMPIRE CITY SUBWAY COMPANY (LIMITED), THE EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT REVIEW COMMITTEE OF NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY AND EMPIRE CITY SUBWAY COMPANY (LIMITED), DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Louis L. Stanton, United States District Judge
Both sides move for summary (or partial summary) judgment on the claim
for breach of collective bargaining agreements and for payment of
benefits under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). Defendants also move for summary judgment
on the remaining counts of the complaint. The complaint charges
defendants with breach of collective bargaining agreements ("CBAs") in
violation of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and
asserts other claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.
Plaintiffs claim defendants changed their interpretation and
application of employee benefits plans, to plaintiffs' detriment, in May
1990 or June 1992. As a result, plaintiffs contend, their injuries
warranting accident disability benefits were initially misclassified, or
wrongfully reclassified, to receive less generous sickness disability
benefits, because their injuries were not suffered in direct connection
with the performance of their duties. This change, they argue,
the benefits plans without notice to the
Communications Workers of America, in breach of collective bargaining
agreements and defendants' fiduciary duties under ERISA.
The collective bargaining agreements between the parties incorporate by
reference the Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan (the
The language in the Plan defining accident disability benefits has
remained unchanged since 1971:
1. Participation — All employees shall be
participants in the Accident Disability Benefit Plan
and qualified to receive payments under the Plan on
account of physical disability work by reason of
accidental injury (not including the accidental
injuries specified in Paragraph 12 of Section 6)
arising out of and in the course of employment by the
Company or a Former Affiliate or Associated or Allied
Company from which the employee was reassigned as of
January 1, 1984. . . .
5. Relationship of Injury to Employment —
Accidental injuries shall be considered as arising out
of and in the course of employment only where the
injury has resulted solely from accident during and in
direct connection with the performance of duties to
which the employee is assigned in the service of the
Company, or was assigned by the Former Affiliate or
Associated or Allied Company from which the employee
was reassigned as of January 1, 1984, or which he is
directed to perform by proper authority, or in
voluntarily protecting the Company's property or
interests. . . .
Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan, Sec 5., ¶¶ 1, 5.
(Waldron Aff., Ex. 1).
The definition of "Sickness Disability Benefits" is given at section
4, paragraph one of the Plan:
For the purposes of the Plan, sickness shall include
injury other than accidental injury arising out of and
in the course of employment by the Company or by the
Former Affiliate or Associated or Allied Company from
which an employee was reassigned on January 1, 1984.
The Plan is administered in accordance with a Summary Plan Description
("SPD"), a document required by ERISA and designed to simplify and
explain the terms of the plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1022;
29 C.F.R. § 2520.102-2(a). The SPD provides:
SICKNESS DISABILITY BENEFITS
This part of the plan provides benefits when your
illness or "off-duty accident" requires mote time
off than the Incidental Absence policy covers.
(An off-duty accident is an ...
Buy This Entire Record For