Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

LATINO OFFICERS ASSOC. CITY OF NEW YORK v. CITY OF NEW YORK

United States District Court, Southern District of New York


April 18, 2003

LATINO OFFICERS ASSOCIATION CITY OF NEW YORK, INC., ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lewis A. Kaplan, District Judge

ORDER

Defendants move for an order limiting the number of non-statistical evidence witnesses plaintiffs may offer in the pattern and practice liability phase of this employment discrimination class action. They reasonably point out that "the liability phase [of such a case] is largely preoccupied with class-wide statistical evidence directed at establishing an overall pattern or practice of intentional discrimination" and note this Court's undoubted power under Fed.R.Evid. 403 "to ensure that the liability phase remains manageable" by "limit[ing] the anecdotal evidence" of discrimination. Def. Mem. 3 (quoting Robinson v. Metro North Commuter R.R. Co., 267 F.3d 147, 168 (2d Cir. 2001). They fail, however, to offer any reasoned framework for exercising that power. In any case, it is too early in this litigation to pass on this issue.

Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal following disposition of any controversies concerning the admissibility of statistical evidence and on a more reasoned approach to ensuring that the trial remains within appropriate limits. See, e.g., Evans v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, No. 00 Civ. 5753 (LAK), 2003 WL 470540 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2003).

SO ORDERED.

20030418

© 1992-2003 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.