Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

EVANS v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK

United States District Court, Southern District of New York


July 10, 2003

NEVILLE EVANS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lewis Kaplan, District Judge

ORDER

On June 16, 2003, plaintiff moved for leave to serve an amended complaint, the original of which is docket item 9. The proposed pleading seeks to add claims of discrimination in 2003 with regard to the positions of physical plant manager and operations manager at the George Washington Bridge and physical plant manager at the Staten Island bridges.*fn1 The caption of the amended complaint includes the abbreviation "et al." after the name of the defendant, thus implying that there was more than one defendant. The proposed amended complaint, however, identifies only the Port Authority as a, indeed, "the defendant."

By letter dated June 24, 2003, the Port Authority informed the Court that it had no objection to the inclusion of the three new discrimination claims but noted the ambiguity of the proposed pleading as to whether the Port Authority is the only defendant. Plaintiff's counsel responded with a letter claiming that he inadvertently had failed to name Philmus and Holmes as defendants, was engaged in discussions with the defendant about which claims he would proceed upon, and sought a two week extension within which to resubmit the proposed amended complaint.

The two weeks now have elapsed without any further word from plaintiff s counsel. Accordingly, the motion for leave to amend is granted save that the "et al." shall not be included in the caption and the Port Authority will stand as the sole defendant absent further order of the Court. If plaintiff wishes to drop any of the claims in the amended complaint, he may do so. If he wishes leave to add defendants, he may seek leave, although the Court certainly is not suggesting that leave to do so necessarily would be granted.

The amended complaint is deemed served and filed today. The defendant shall answer or move with respect to the amended complaint within 10 days.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.