United States District Court, S.D. New York
February 4, 2004.
OSRECOVERY, INC., Plaintiff, -against- ONE GROUPE INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al, Defendants
The opinion of the court was delivered by: LEWIS KAPLAN, District Judge
Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the second amended complaint as
to defendant Parex Bank [docket item 137] is granted. In so ruling, the
Court has not determined whether the allegations of the proposed third
amended complaint is legally sufficient as to Parex, which is free to
raise such contentions in an appropriate motion addressed to the third
The cross-motion of defendant Parex Bank to dismiss the second amended
complaint [docket item 149] is denied as moot.
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.