Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

IN RE BUCURESCU

United States District Court, S.D. New York


May 20, 2004.

In re NICHITA MARIUS BUCURESCU, et ano., Debtors NICHITA MARIUS BUCURESCU, et ano., Appellants, -against- 190A REALTY CORP., Appellee

The opinion of the court was delivered by: LEWIS KAPLAN, District Judge

ORDER

Appellants move for reconsideration of this Court's order, dated May 3, 2004, dismissing their appeal.

The Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that the order supposedly appealed from did not appear on the docket sheet. Appellants now claim that the order in question actually was docketed, albeit in Adv. Pro. No. 01-8085A (CB). This appears to be correct.

  It is a nice question whether the notice of appeal was sufficient to vest jurisdiction in this Court inasmuch as the order appealed from was entered, apparently in error, in a different case. The Court assumes that it was and therefore vacates the May 3, 2004 order and reinstates the appeal. But this ultimately avails appellants naught.

  The order appealed from is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in the appellee's brief. The Clerk shall close this case.

  SO ORDERED.

20040520

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.