United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2004.
OSRECOVERY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, -against- ONE GROUPE INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants
The opinion of the court was delivered by: LEWIS KAPLAN, District Judge
Defendant Latvian Economic Commercial Bank ("Lateko"), by letter
dated May 17, 2004, seeks the Court's assistance with respect to a
discovery dispute with the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs responded by letter
dated May 17, 2004. The matter is disposed of as follows:
1. Plaintiffs shall disclose their identities in sworn answers to the
interrogatories. As the Court previously indicated, they may designate so
much of the answers as contain their names under the confidentiality
order so as to restrict access to that information to outside counsel for
2. Plaintiffs shall respond to Interrogatory 2 save that their
objection to providing their places of employment is sustained.
3. Plaintiffs' objections to Lateko's second set of interrogatories are
overruled save their objection to Request No. 17, which is sustained.
Plaintiffs' contention that discovery relating to assignments of claims
is moot because OSRecovery has been dropped as a plaintiff is impossible
to reconcile with the fact that OSRecovery remains a plaintiff in the
third amended complaint and appears to seek damages on behalf of
approximately 1, 200 invididuals.
4. Plaintiffs shall complete their responses to the Interrogatories and
Document Requests within thirty days of the date of this order.
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.