Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

IN RE REZULIN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

United States District Court, S.D. New York


June 13, 2004.

In re: REZULIN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1348). This Document Relates to: 03 Civ. 6370, 03 Civ. 6374, 03 Civ. 6379, 03 Civ. 6380, 03 Civ. 6401.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: LEWIS KAPLAN, District Judge

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 291 (Certain Remand Motions)

In PTO 280, issued on June 3, 2004, and corrected on June 8, 2004, the Court adopted the May 17, 2004, report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Katz which recommended denial of the remand motions in these cases on the grounds that there was no reasonable possibility that plaintiffs could prevail against the non-diverse defendants, including physicians, pharmacies and sales representatives.

The Court became aware that plaintiffs had filed objections to Judge Katz's report only after it issued PTO 280. The Court now considers the objections de novo and finds them to be without merit.

  Accordingly, the objections to the report and recommendation [00 Civ. 2843, docket item 2042] are overruled and the motions to remand are denied.

  SO ORDERED.

20040613

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.