United States District Court, S.D. New York
July 27, 2004.
EDWIN FERNANDEZ, Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: ROBERT PATTERSON, Senior District Judge
OPINION AND ORDER
By motion dated June 3, 2004, Defendant Edwin Fernandez moves
for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure Rule 29(c), or in the alternative, a new trial pursuant
to Rule 33(a).
By Defendant's own admission, "This motion is based on the
previous arguments, objections and motions for a mistrial made
during the proceedings." (Affirmation at ¶ 2.) Other than a one
page affirmation, Defendant offers no further support for his
motion. Accordingly, no new arguments, other than the ones raised
and addressed orally, at the trial have been made. The Court made
rulings on Defendant's objections and his two motions for a
mistrial at the time of the trial and after full consideration
denied them. In the absence of further legal arguments, these
rulings still stand
The Defendant's motions are denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.