Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

GRILLO v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York


January 18, 2005.

JOSEPH GRILLO, Movant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: LEWIS KAPLAN, District Judge

ORDER

Movant was convicted on his plea of guilty to one count of theft of mail by a U.S. Postal employee and one county of access device fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1709 and 1029(a)(3) and 2, respectively. He now moves for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

The nub of the issue is an error in the judgment of conviction. As the transcript of the sentencing demonstrates, the Court sentenced the movant in relevant part to "a term of imprisonment of 33 months on each count, the terms to run concurrently." Tr., Dec. 22, 2003, at 13. Regretably, the judgment of conviction erroneously states that movant was sentencing to 33 months "on each count, the terms to run consecutively." The Court regrets the error.

  The motion is granted to the extent that the judgment of conviction is modified to state that the movant was sentenced to a term of 33 months imprisonment on each count, the terms to run concurrently.

  SO ORDERED.

20050118

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.