Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
CORDERO v. LANO
May 3, 2005.
DR. RICHARD CORDERO, Appellant,
v.
DAVID DE LANO and MARY ANN DE LANO, Respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID LARIMER, Chief Judge, District
Dr. Richard Cordero's motion for reconsideration of this
Court's denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt.
#3 in 05-MC-6008L) is denied.
The motion filed by Dr. Cordero, styled as "Objection to
Scheduling Order and Request For Its Urgent Rescission" (Dkt. # 3
in 05-CV-6190L) is granted in part. Appellant may have until June
13, 2005, within which to file and serve his brief. In all other
respects, the motion is denied.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw ...